Cordingley v. Borough of Mendham
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cukjam.
A writ of certiorari was allowed in this case to review the action of the governing body of the borough of Mendham in executing certain leases, namely (a) lease made between the borough of Mendham and Groendyke and Day, on October 1st, 1930, in which the borough is tenant; (b) lease made between the borough and Groendyke, dated June 6th, 1933, in which the borough is likewise tenant; (c) lease of borough property made to Berkeley Lumber and Supply Company, dated Ma}r 8th, 1933.
*332(a) On October 1st, 1930, the borough of Mendham executed a lease by which it rented from Messrs.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Carr v. Borough of MerchantvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- Sturr v. Borough of ElmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aldom v. Borough of RoselandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Colwell v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Hyland v. SimmonsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Leonardis v. BunnellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Brody v. City of MillvilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.