Legal Opinion
Noble v. First Nat. Bank of Anniston
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 27, 1941No. 7 Div. 635PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
In Noble v. First National Bank, 236 Ala. 499, 183 So. 393, 396, the salient features of the will of Susie Parker Stringfellow are to be found and reference fhereto as set out in the report on former appeal will suffice all purposes here.
It was there insisted that the estate of Susie Parker Stringfellow had suffered so great a shrinkage in value from the date of the execution and probate of the will in 1920 to the time of the falling in of the life estate of the husband, that no reasonable prospect remained for the establishment and maintenance of a hospital for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dornan v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Brammer v. Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Lovelace v. Marion InstituteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Dunn v. EllisorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Crim v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McNichols v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Hollis v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
- State, Dept. of Rev. Gross IT Div. v. BETHEL SAN.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Kew Gardens Sanitarium, Inc. v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992