Legal Opinion
Grosso v. Resor
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 13, 1971No. Civ. A. No. 70-0-1538PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Stephen Grosso, presently serving with the 25th Infantry Division, Vietnam, petitions this court for mandamus and habeas corpus relief on the grounds that (1) his induction into the Army was unlawful because he was medically unfit under procurement medical standards due to the existence of a left inguinal hernia (Army Regulation 40-501, Chap. 2, Sec. II, Par. 2-3h) and (2) the Army has failed to follow Army Regulation 635-200, Chap. 5, Sec. Ill, Pars. 5-5 and 5-9 and Army Regulation 40-501, Chap. 11, Sec. XIV, Par. 11-16 (b), in connection therewith.
After a hearing…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States of America Ex Rel. Arthur Rudick v. Melvin Laird, Secretary of Defense, and Stanley Resor, Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Feliciano v. LairdCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. David Henry HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Feeny v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1973
- United States v. MangoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Myers v. ParkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- United States v. LavinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Vallecillo v. DavidDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.