Legal Opinion

Council of Commuter Organizations v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 16, 1982No. 858, Docket 81-7804PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

Litigation to enforce the complex regulatory pattern established by the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7642 (Supp. Ill 1979), may be brought in a district court or a court of appeals, depending upon the relief sought. In general, a court of appeals may consider challenges to agency action taken by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), § 7607(b), 1 and a district court is the proper forum for suits to compel the EPA to take nondiscretionary action and to compel state and local agencies and officials to comply with requirements of a state implementation plan (SIP)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Friends of the Earth v. Hugh CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Friends of the Earth v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State of NY v. General Elec. Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1984
  2. Suburban O'Hare Commission v. Elizabeth Hanford Dole, Secretary of the Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Conservation Law Foundation v. Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  4. Wilder v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  5. Wilder v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API