Legal Opinion
In re E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. C-8 Personal Injury Litig.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 11, 2015No. Civil Action 2:13-md-2433PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the Court on Defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company's Motion to Exclude "Narrative" Testimony (ECF No. 2821). That Motion is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 3200, 3548.) For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendant's Motion.
I
Defendant E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company ("DuPont") directs its Motion to expert witnesses who were retained by Plaintiff Carla Marie Bartlett and Plaintiff John M. Wolf, the first two Plaintiffs selected for trial ("Trial Plaintiffs") in this multidistrict litigation ("MDL"),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- James Nelson, (Each and Every in This Class Action Suit) v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company El Paso Tennessee Pipeline CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Deborah Jahn v. Equine Services, Psc Scott D. Bennett, D.V.M. Mary Beth Wallingford, D.V.M. And Richard Griffin, D.V.M.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johns v. CR BardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Johns v. CR BardDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Milanesi v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021