Windsor v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Edith Schlain Windsor brings this action challenging the constitutionality of Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”), 1 U.S.C. § 7. The Biparti san Legal Advisory Group of the United States House of Representatives (“BLAG”) has filed a motion to intervene as a party defendant pursuant to Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons that follow, the motion is granted.
Background
Ms. Windsor and Thea Clara Spyer were married in 2007 following a 40-year engagement. (Amended Complaint…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. LovettSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Burke v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter v. Sequa Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Windsor v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Revelis v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012