Legal Opinion

United States v. CNA Financial Corp.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 4, 2001No. A98-285 CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER FROM CHAMBERS

SEDWICK, District Judge.

I. PRELIMINARY ORDER

At docket 30, plaintiff United States of America moves for summary judgment. Defendants CNA Financial Corporation and the Continental Casualty Company d/b/a The Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) oppose the motion and cross-move for summary judgment at docket 31. Continental filed a timely request for oral argument. 1 The United States has filed an additional motion at docket 40 seeking to strike certain portions of Continental’s briefing. Oral argu ment is scheduled for September 11, 2001. The purpose of this…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Olympic, Inc. v. Providence Washington Insurance Co. of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Alaska Insurance Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. KICC-Alcan General, Joint Venture v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 2017
  2. United States v. CNA Financial Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API