Legal Opinion · Dissent

Amoco Production Co. v. Armold, Director of Taxation

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 26, 1974No. 47,050Published

1DissentFontron, J.

I respectfully suggest that under rules *653of appellate procedure to which this court has long adhered, the instant case should be reversed, period.

The Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act, K. S. A. 79-3271 to 79-3293, was adopted by the Kansas Legislature in 1963 “to provide for uniform allocation and apportionment of the state income taxes of any taxpayer doing a multi-state business.” (Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonald, 202 Kan. 98, 99, 446 P. 2d 781.) According to an article by Keesling and Warren, California’s Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act, appearing in 15…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Western Natural Gas Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Donald M. Drake Company v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Potts v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. WaldoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API