Legal Opinion

Harper v. Wayman

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.

A tort judgment was secured against the defendants herein, one of whom, Mr. Wayman, was insured with the General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corporation, Ltd., which company ultimately paid the entire judgment. By this motion, joined in by both the insurance carrier and by Mr. Wayman, an order is sought directing the Clerk of the County of Broome to enter a judgment in favor of the insurance carrier for the amount of the excess paid over and above Wayman’s prorata share. The sole issue presented is whether or not under section 211-a of the Civil Practice Act an insurance carrier which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Hooker Electrochemical Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. Hadcock v. WigginsNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. McColl v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Travelers Insurance v. McLaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Caucci v. FeskoNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API