Legal Opinion

Caucci v. Fesko

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1973PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtP. Raymond Sibignano, J.

This is a motion by the defendants Fesko and 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., for contribution pursuant to CPLR 1401. Defendant Caggiano cross-moves for apportionment of liability under the principles of Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143) and its progeny (Kelly v. Long Is. Light Co., 31 N Y 2d 25). The question presented to the court is whether, after a post-Dow trial and appeal, apportionment may be had based upon respective fault where that issue was not expressly presented in the prior proceedings.

Before determining the motions, a recital of the salient facts is essential: On May 22,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lipson v. GewirtzNew York District Court · 1972
  2. Hairston v. BroadwaterNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Liebman v. County of WestchesterNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Mosca v. PenskyNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Henriquez v. Mission Motor Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. BarnettNew York Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API