Legal Opinion

Eppinger v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1999No. A98A2348PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, Judge.

James E. Eppinger appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for driving with a suspended license, contending that the evidence of notice to him was insufficient. Because we find the evidence more than sufficient, we affirm.

We note that, because the recording equipment malfunctioned at trial, there is no transcript and the parties have stipulated that “the issue this court is to decide is whether the notice which was provided to [Eppinger] was sufficient to inform him that his license was suspended, as evidenced by properly admitted exhibits 1, 2, and 3.”

The exhibits…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Payne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Worthy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Vickers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Foster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API