Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Wilkinson v. Hines

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 29, 1934No. 6165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

Appellant Thaddeus R. Wilkinson, as petitioner, brought this case in the lower court for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, as administrator of veterans’ affairs, to pay to appellant certain permanent and total disability benefits accrued, as alleged, under a *515contract with the United States for yearly renewable war risk term insurance.

In his petition appellant alleged in substance that on June 5,1916, he enlisted in the military service of the United States and served therein until February 5, 1919; that while in tie service he entered into a contract with the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. LykeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  4. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  5. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Kontovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States v. KnolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Morgan v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API