Legal Opinion
Magnolia Ross, Petitioner-Appellee-Appellant v. Robert Heyne and Theodore L. Sendak, Respondents-Appellants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 10, 1980No. 80-1318, 80-1394PublishedCited by 75 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUER, Circuit Judge.
After exhausting her state court remedies, petitioner Magnolia Ross filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. She claimed that she was denied due process when the state knowingly used false testimony and that she was denied the effective assistance of counsel. The district court granted Ross’ petition on the ground that she had been denied due process, but found that she was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Ross v. Heyne, 483 F.Supp. 798 (N.D.Ind.1980).
The state appeals from the district court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Monte McPherson v. Daniel R. McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Zepp, Jo-Ann. Appeal of Jo Ann ZeppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Millard BowieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- People v. MahaffeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.