Legal Opinion
Employees of the Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1991No. Nos. 88-7138, 88-7162 and 89-70504PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated proceeding, various labor organizations (the Unions) petition for review of three orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). In these orders, the ICC denied labor protective benefits to employees represented by the Unions. On appeal, the Unions argue that the ICC acted arbitrarily and capriciously or exceeded its jurisdiction in vacating an arbitration decision awarding benefits to the employees. The Unions also contend that the ICC should have reversed a second arbitration decision denying benefits. We affirm the orders of the ICC.
BACKGROUND
W…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Central States Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United Transportation Union v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.