Legal Opinion

Willard v. Nelson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to the district court for Platte county. Tried below before Smith, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This is an action to recover of the defendant in error the amount of a promissory note for the sum of $120, which it is alleged he executed at Columbus, this state, on the 26 th day of October, 1887, payable to the order of Cole, Grant & Co. one year after date, with interest at ten per cent, and indorsed by the payees to the plaintiff before maturity.

The answer sets up the illiteracy of the defendant, want of consideration, and that the note was procured by fraud and circumvention practiced upon him «by the agent of Cole, Grant & Co. The reply denies the allegations of the answer. The jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Soper v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Bowers v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  3. First National Bank v. LiermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whipple v. FowlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 32 v. Continental Western Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Snelgrove v. EarlUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Pearce v. McKayNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API