Legal Opinion

Pearce v. McKay

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1895No. 5976PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Saline county. Tried below before Bush, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, C. J.

Plaintiff in error was plaintiff in the court below, and from a judgment dismissing the action he prosecutes error.

The first two assignments in the petition in error are based upon the admission of certain testimony given by the defendant, over the objections and exceptions of the plaintiff. We will not here reproduce the testimony claimed to be objectionable, nor determine whether the same was improperly admitted. Conceding, as contended, that the testimony was wrongfully received, it is not sufficient ground for reversal, inasmuch as the cause was tried to the court without a jury. This is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whipple v. FowlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Glaze v. ParcelNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ward v. ParlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Enyeart v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Richardson v. DotyNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Drexel v. TrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  2. Hans v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Village of Syracuse v. MapesNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Allsman v. RichmondNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Conway v. GrimesNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API