Legal Opinion

Lynch v. McGhan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1907No. Civ. No. 327PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, granting a new trial. Frank H. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from an order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover damages for the conversion of six horses and some other personal property.

The court found that “plaintiff has been damaged by such unlawful conversion in the following specific amounts, namely: the sum of $252.60 cash táken from plaintiff; the sum of $160, the value of the aforesaid six horses; the sum of $17, the amount of time and money spent by plaintiff in the pursuit of the aforesaid property; the sum of $140, on account of the loss of use of the aforesaid six horses from the time of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Oberlander v. Fixen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Hamer v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Douglass v. KraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Yukon River Steamboat Co. v. GrattoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Galbreath v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API