Alphonse v. State

LEHAN, Judge.

Appellant appeals from her adjudication of guilt, and sentencing, for the offenses of possession of cannabis and sale of cannabis. The trial court imposed separate sentences for each offense.

Appellant’s first contention is that the trial court erred by imposing separate sentences for the possession and sale of the same controlled substances. We disagree. Separate sentences under these circumstances were proper. Smith v. State, 430 So.2d 448 (Fla.1983); Fundak v. State, 362 So.2d 295 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

Appellant’s second contention is that the written sentences are at variance…