Legal Opinion
Smith v. State
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 12, 1983No. 61794PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
430 So.2d 448 (1983)
Robert Lee SMITH, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 61794.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 12, 1983.
Ronald A. Dion, Entin, Schwartz, Dion and Sclafani, North Miami Beach, and Clyde M. Taylor, Jr., Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Peggy A. Quince, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent.
McDONALD, Justice.
We have accepted jurisdiction of this cause, pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, because the district court opinion, Smith v. State, 412 So.2d 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), acknowledges conflict with Drayton v. State, 372…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Borges v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Yost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Fundak v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Drayton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- State v. AcostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Amlotte v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- State v. BurtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
- Portee v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.