Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 2, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00145Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE ARTHUR CHARLES SMITH, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Nos. 3:19-CV-145 ) 3:13-CR-005 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Arthur Charles Smith’s (“Petitioner’s”) pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Doc. 1; Criminal Docket (“Crim.”) Doc. 119].1 The United States has responded in opposition [Doc. 9]. Petitioner did not file a reply, and the time for doing so has passed. See Rule 5(d) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API