St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Green
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado
Ruling on Demurrer.)
1Opinion of the Court
McCrary, Circuit Judge,
(orally.)
This is an action of ejectment, and the record shows, and the defendants by their pleadings admit, that the plaintiff claims under a patent of the United States. Some of the questions in the case have been determined heretofore upon demurrers to former answers. The questions now to be considered arise upon demurrer to the third amended answer. By this pleading, the defendants seek to attack, in this action of ejectment, the patent under which the plaintiff claims. They do so upon two grounds, sub stantially. The answer is quite voluminous, but its allegations…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Polk's Lessee v. WendalSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Daniel Boardman and Others, in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M'call and Others, in ErrorSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Doe Ex Dem. Patterson v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Hoofnagle v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Portsmouth Savings BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Kemp v. HammockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916