Legal Opinion

Hoofnagle v. Anderson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1822PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ohio.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

This suit was brought by the appellants, who were plaintiffs in the Circuit Court for the District of Ohio, to obtain a decree for the conveyance of a tract of land of which the respondent haá the legal title.

The land lies within the tract of country reserved by the Commonwealth of Virginia, out of her session to the United States for the officers and sol diers of the Virginia Continental line. The respondent’s patent is dated on the 9th day of October, 1804, and is founded on a warrant for military ser- ■ r r ¥T. . . c vices, issued from the land ornee of Virginia, to Seymour Powell, heir of…

2Cited by56 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Brush v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. Lindsey and Others v. the Lessee of MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API