Legal Opinion

(PC) Thomas v. Fry

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 31, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01041Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, No. 2:19-cv-1041 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 J.C. FRY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. On September 3, 2019, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to 19 do under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend and the 20 court gave plaintiff’s instructions and guidance as to the contents of his amended complaint. 21 Plaintiff…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API