Legal Opinion
Brady v. Chemical Construction Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 31, 1984No. 1291, Docket 84-7097PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MESKILL, Circuit Judge:
Two insurance companies, The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (Hartford) and the National Surety Corporation (National), appeal from a judgment entered after a jury trial by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Broderick, J.1 The jury found *197that the insurance companies were liable to Chemical Construction Corporation (Chemico) on fidelity bonds covering employee dishonesty. Judgment was entered in favor of Chemico in the amount of $1,156,365.70, plus interest and costs. The insurance companies also appeal the district court’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Cecil RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Victor Bevevino v. M. S. SaydjariCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Robert L. Abernathy and Joyce Abernathy v. Superior Hardwoods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Nicholas C. Scheib v. Williams-Mcwilliams Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Bohack Corp. v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Metromedia Co. v. FugazyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Fiacco v. City Of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. FlahartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. FlahartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Ivar J. Queen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.