Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1938No. 26,869PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.

This action was brought by the State of Indiana against the appellant Clarence Lee, Ira Williams, and Dan Terhune by filing an affidavit against them in three counts, charging petit larceny, burglary, and a conspiracy to commit a felony. The appellant was found guilty on the second count charging burglary.

The errors relied upon by the appellant for reversal are: (1) the overruling of his motion to quash the amended affidavit; (2) that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial; and (3) in overruling appellant’s motion to correct and modify the judgment.

The only grounds…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Masterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Goodman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Knox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Rokvic v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rhodes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Dewey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bradley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Vaughn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  5. United States v. GradyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API