Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Z.L.B.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 29, 2001No. 05-00-00222-CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion By

Justice FITZGERALD.

The evidence was legally sufficient to support the trial court’s delinquency adjudication, and I therefore join that portion of this Court’s opinion. The majority, however, reverses the trial court’s judgment because of the admission of certain hearsay evidence that “did not meet the outcry exception to the hearsay rule.” More specifically, the majority concludes the day care director was not the first person the complainant told about the sexual contact. I respectfully dissent.

The petition alleges that on or about April 15, 1999,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API