Legal Opinion

Jones v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1936No. 5670PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELIAS HANSEN, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff herein applied for, but was denied, compensation by the Industrial Commission of Utah. He brings the cause here for review. In his application for compensation filed with the commission, plaintiff alleged that on June 4, 1932, while in the course of his employment as city judge of Brigham City, Utah, he, in an automobile accident, sustained an injury to his “left limb, ankle and toes, and arteries and veins and nerves and disability followed with loss of the bodily function.” At the time of the alleged injury the State Insurance Fund was the insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moray v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bingham Mines Co. v. AllsopUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Denver & R. G. W. R. System v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  4. American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kincheloe v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of OgdenUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Crane v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Building Service Employees Local No. 59 v. Newhouse Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mower v. McCARTHYUtah Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API