Legal Opinion
Walker v. City Motor Car Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 5, 1958No. 17396PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, Justice.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation Case.
The Findings of Fact by the hearing Commissioner were:
“1. That all parties to this proceeding are subject to and bound by the terms and provisions of the South Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act.
“2. That claimant was employed by City Motor Car Company on March 24, 1956, and that on this date he suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment.
“3. That claimant, Jerome E. Walker, has reached maximum improvement of his accidental injury of March 24, 1956, and as a result has a 25 per cent permanent partial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Radcliffe v. Southern Aviation SchoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
- Parrott v. Barfield Used PartsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Hines v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Glover v. Columbia Hospital of Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Fowler v. Abbott Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Therrell v. Jerry's Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Kennedy v. Williamsburg CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
- Bateman v. Town & Country Furniture Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.