Legal Opinion
Hines v. Pacific Mills
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 3, 1949No. 16163PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The Order of Judge Sease follows:
This case is before me on appeal from an Award of the South Carolina Industrial Commission affirming an Award of the Single Commissioner, whereby the Defendants were directed to pay to the Claimant the sum of Twelve Hundred and Fifty and no/100 ($1250.00) Dollars "for serious bodily disfigurement", the basis for such Award, as set forth in the Hearing Commissioner's Opinion, being because of the removal of one of Claimant's…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fink v. Sheldon Axle & Spring Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Rudd v. Fairforest Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Mack v. Post ExchangeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Branch v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tiller v. National Health Care CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Hargrove v. Titan Textile Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Anderson v. Baptist Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Wynn v. Peoples Natural Gas Co. of SCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.