Legal Opinion

People v. Blick

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 2007No. A112744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

In this case we hold that Penal Code section 550, subdivision (b)(3) (section 550(b)(3)) is a specific intent crime. Defendant Anita Beatriz Blick appeals the judgment and sentence imposed following her jury trial conviction premised on this section. Blick contends: (1) she was denied due process of law by the trial court’s section 550(b)(3) instruction, which allegedly described that count as a strict liability offense not requiring proof of a culpable mental state; (2) the trial court erred by failing to instruct sua sponte on mistake of fact as a defense on the section…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. People v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. KurtenbachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. P. ex rel. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Discovery Radiology etc.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. P. ex rel. Alzayat v. Hebb CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. P. v. Morales CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API