Legal Opinion

Columbia River Steamship Operators' Association v. Port of Astoria

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 16, 2022No. 3:19-cv-01478Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON COLUMBIA RIVER STEAMSHIP Case No. 3:19-cv-1478-JR OPERATORS’ ASSOCIATION, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Columbia River Steamship Operators’ Association (CRSOA) has moved for summary judgment on its claims that a fee imposed by Defendant Port of Astoria (Port) is invalid under the Tonnage Clause, the Commerce Clause, and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.1 The Port has cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing that the fee at issue is…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API