Columbia River Steamship Operators' Association v. Port of Astoria
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON COLUMBIA RIVER STEAMSHIP Case No. 3:19-cv-1478-JR OPERATORS’ ASSOCIATION, OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. PORT OF ASTORIA, Defendant. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Columbia River Steamship Operators’ Association (CRSOA) has moved for summary judgment on its claims that a fee imposed by Defendant Port of Astoria (Port) is invalid under the Tonnage Clause, the Commerce Clause, and the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.1 The Port has cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing that the fee at issue is…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.