Legal Opinion

State v. Brinklow

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 30, 2009No. 96,231PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnson, J.:

Earl Brinklow seeks our review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming his convictions and sentences on six counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child. Brinklow contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to sequester witnesses; that the prosecutor’s misconduct denied him a fair trial; that the evidence was insufficient to support the convictions; that cumulative error denied him a fair trial; and that the district court violated his constitutional rights by considering his prior criminal history in determining…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. IvorySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. State v. ToshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  4. State v. SpragueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. HoltSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API