Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Plott Nursing Home v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 3, 2015No. 12-70174Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChristen, Circuit Judge

I concur in the court’s holding with respect to the two deficiencies that formed *990the basis of the $500 per day penalty sustained by the Department of Health and Human Services Appeals Board. But because the court’s holding as to the unre-viewed deficiencies accords with neither our statutory jurisdiction nor with well-established principles of judicial review, I respectfully dissent from Part C of the court’s analysis.

The skilled nursing facility provisions of the Medicare Act provide: “[T]he Secretary may impose a civil money penalty in an amount not to exceed $10,000 for each day of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Sunshine Haven Nursing Operations, LLC v. United States Department of Health & Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Keene Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API