Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Muckelrath

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 22, 1960No. 13,238Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLatimer, Judge

(concurring in part and dissenting in part) :

I concur in part and dissent in part.

While I agree with my associates that the evidence is indeed legally sufficient to support the findings, I am constrained to dissociate myself from the remainder of the Court’s opinion.

As the majority pointed out in United States v Morris, 8 USCMA 755, 25 CMR 259, if a post-trial review, when considered in its entirety, is not misleading, then isolated inaccuracies may be disregarded. Unimportant inaccuracies do not justify setting aside otherwise valid advice. United States v Sulewski, 9 USCMA 490, 26 CMR 270.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. HelfrickUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. ReamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. SulewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  4. United States v. MorrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. TeitsortUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API