Legal Opinion
Board of Education of Village of Estancia v. Woodmen of World
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 10, 1935No. 1159PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff below — appellee here — brought this action at law upon bonds issued by appellant. After issue joined, the cause was tried to the court without a jury. Judgment went for plaintiff. The bill of exceptions contains stipulations of evidentiary facts. The trial court made special findings, among them that the facts stipulated are true; that except as so stipulated, allegations of new. matter in the answer are *32not true; that allegations in the repiy are true; that plaintiff is a bona fide purchaser for value of the bonds sued on; that the bonds were legally…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Parkersburg v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Dixon County v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Town of Coloma v. EavesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Buchanan v. LitchfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Gunnison County Commissioners v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barrett v. Hunter, Warden. Rutledge v. Hunter, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- City of Albuquerque v. GottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- State Ex Rel. Porterie v. Board of Liquidation of State DebtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Southwest Securities Co. v. Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- American Samoa Government v. Samoa Aviation, Inc.High Court of American Samoa · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.