Legal Opinion

Peters v. Burt D. Howe Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1927No. Docket No. 98PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff in her own right owned on land contract a house and lot in Highland Park, where she and her husband lived. He was a dealer in metals as was also the defendant Burt D. Howe Company, a Michigan corporation. It is unnecessary to refer to the other party to this suit. Mr. Peters had traded extensively with the defendant, and Mr. Howe of the company 'had aided him financially. They were friends. Mr. Peters was in financial straits. Defendant was his largest creditor, and Mr. Howe evidently was hopeful that Mr. Peters might not fail. To strengthen his credit, it is said, defendant loaned…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. OsbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Citizens' Savings Bank v. DarlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sponseller v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Wendland v. Citizens Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API