Legal Opinion

United States v. Patricia Foreman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1991No. 89-50038PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The above-entitled opinion found at 905 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir.1990) is amended per the attached. With these amendments Judges Browning and Boochever vote to deny the petition for rehearing. Judge Reinhardt votes to grant it. Judges Browning and Reinhardt reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc and Judge Boochever so recommends.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. (Fed.R.App.P. 35.)

The petition for rehearing is denied and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.

AME…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. Kenneth Wayne Daughtrey, A/K/A Kenneth Wayne DaughtryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Robin F. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Michael A. AjiboyeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Technic Services, Inc. And Rick RushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Alex SierraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Leroy K. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API