Legal Opinion

Davenport v. City of Rock Hill

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 1993No. 23868PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Associate Justice:

This proceeding is brought within the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court due to the significant public interest involved. See Key v. Currie, 305 S.C. 115, 406 S.E. (2d) 356 (1991). We deny relief.

The city council (council) of Rock Hill (City) adopted a tax ordinance effective January 1, 1992, which provided that the council was empowered at any time in 1992 to authorize the issuance of tax anticipation notes (TANS) pursuant to S.C. Const, art. X, § 14 and S.C. Code Ann. § 11-27-40 (1986). On July 1992, the City issued TANS 1 in the amount of $3 million. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Caddell v. Lexington County School District No. 1Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  2. Key v. CurrieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Ravenel v. DekleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Haddon v. Cheatham, County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  5. Doyle v. DoyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J.K. Construction, Inc. v. Western Carolina Regional Sewer AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. State v. ElwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. HercheckSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. Bowles v. BradleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  5. Arkay, LLC v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API