Legal Opinion

Fern v. Fern

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 21, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

140 N.J. Super. 121 (1976)

355 A.2d 672

RAYE L. FERN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT,

v.

MORRIS FERN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 15, 1975.

Decided January 21, 1976.

Before Judges FRITZ, SEIDMAN and MILMED.

Mr. Nathan Reibel argued the cause for defendant-appellant and cross-respondent (Messrs. Reibel, Isaac, Tannenbaum & Epstein, attorneys).

Mr. Adrian M. Unger argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant (Messrs. Milton M. and Adrian M. Unger, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  2. Schlemm v. SchlemmSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Seuss v. SchukatIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Schiff v. SchiffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  5. Berkowitz v. BerkowitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marschall v. MarschallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
  2. In Re Js & C.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  3. D'Onofrio v. D'OnofrioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  4. Lynn v. LynnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Broadhurst v. BroadhurstMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API