Legal Opinion

Gould v. Maine Central Transportation Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 25, 1939Published

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

In these actions on the case to recover damages for personal injuries received by Sarah H. Gould while riding as a passenger in a bus operated by the Maine Central Transportation Co. and for incidental losses suffered by Appleton Gould, her husband, verdicts for the plaintiffs were returned in the Trial Court. The cases come forward on the defendant’s general motions for new trials.

In an earlier trial of these actions, when the plaintiffs had put in their cases, the defendant rested without presenting any evidence *338and, on its motion, was granted directed verdicts. Exceptions were sustained.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jacobi v. Builders' Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Orms v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Chaput v. LussierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  4. Dougherty v. Kansas City & Independence Rapid Transit RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. O'ConnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API