Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 2, 1936No. 13,815PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bouck

This case involves a claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The claim was denied by the Industrial Commission. That denial was affirmed by the district court, and the claimant is here as plaintiff in error, asking a reversal.

It is of course our duty to give the act a liberal construction, with a view to promoting the underlying purpose of applying its beneficent provisions whenever legally possible, in the interests of justice. Central Surety & Ins. Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 84 Colo. 481, 271 Pac. 617.

The claimant, Miss Pearl Morrow, a public-school teacher, then 23 years of age,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
  2. Comerford v. CarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  2. Conover v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Moreno v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  4. Sommers v. BorgmannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API