Legal Opinion

In re Miguel P.

New York City Family Court

Decided August 27, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

John M. Hunt, J.

I

This juvenile delinquency proceeding calls upon the court to address the purpose of the provisions of Family Court Act § 355.1 which provide a mechanism for the filing of motions to modify or vacate prior orders entered in juvenile delinquency cases.

By petition filed pursuant to Family Court Act § 310.1 on December 17, 2008 the respondent, Miguel E, was alleged to have committed acts which, were he an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]) and menacing in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.14 [1]). The…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SpitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. People v. FinneganNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Samiento v. World Yacht Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Alonzo M. v. New York City Department of ProbationNew York Court of Appeals · 1988

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Tilar M.New York City Family Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API