Legal Opinion
In re Tucker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 9, 1998No. 617A97PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REJECTING CENSURE.
The Judicial Standards Commission (Commission) bases its recommendation for censure upon two sets of actions by Judge Tucker (respondent) involving four individual cases. The Commission notified respondent on 15 July 1996 that it had ordered a preliminary investigation to make inquiry concerning alleged misconduct. Special counsel for the Commission filed a complaint against respondent on 19 May 1997, alleging that respondent: (1) disposed of two cases involving defendants charged with driving while impaired (DWI), State v. Mullaney, New Hanover County docket number…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge NowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- In re GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 153, MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
3Cited by10 opinions
- JUDICIAL INQ. AND REVIEW COM'N v. PeatrossSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
- In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 240, HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 238 BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 240 HayesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, Nos. 09-013, 09-018 & 09-029 BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.