Legal Opinion

Teer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 2006No. ED 86500PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKER T. SHAW, Judge.

Michael J. Teer (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion ■without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, Movant argues the motion court erred in denying Movant relief without an evidentiary hearing because his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to (i) file a complete record on appeal and he was prejudiced because this Court was unable to review his direct appeal claim, and (ii) argue the trial court erred in allowing the State to amend the Information by charging Movant as a prior offender after the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Tisius v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. Reuscher v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. State v. NunleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Morales v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TeerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Ivory v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Aaron D. Summers v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Christopher J. Ivory, Movant/Appellant v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Christopher J. Potter v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API