Legal Opinion

Turner v. City of Winterset

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 18, 1930No. 40131PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

On the west side of Block 4, West Addition to the defendant city, was a cement sidewalk. Defendant had constructed a brick crossing across an alley in the center of the block, joining the cement sidewalk at either end thereof. A sanitary sewer was constructed along this alley, and this brick alley-crossing was torn up, for the purpose of construction. It was replaced in 1926, and again repaired in the fall of 1927, and was 16% feet long and 4 feet wide.

Plaintiff claims, — and there is some evidence to support it, —that this alley-crossing was lower than the ground on either side of it; that,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Langhammer v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Ford v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  4. Johnson v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  5. Hodges v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clarke v. HubbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Case v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
  3. Pearson v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Leonard v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Casper v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API