Legal Opinion
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Bear, LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 21, 2017No. Case No.: 15-cv-630-BTM-BLMPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 70] AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE [ECF No. 111]
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (“Underwriters”) has filed a motion for summary judgment. (Underwriters’ Mot. Summ. J. (“Underwriters’ MSJ”), ECF No. 70.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
I, FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This action arises out of a marine insurance coverage dispute relating to the destruction of a 102-foot motor vessel (“the Polar Bear”) owned by Defendant, Bear, LLC (“Bear”).
A. Procuring the 2013…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.