Kern v. Guiry Bros. Wall Paper Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver County Court. Hon. W. C. Hood, Jr., Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtGabbert, C. J.
Counsel for plaintiff in error appear to concede that a lien for material furnished might properly be allowed, but contend that it was error to allow a lien for labor furnished by the company. The act provides that persons performing labor upon a building or furnishing materials therefor, shall have a lien for the value of such labor and materials, and that every person given a lien, whose contract is with the owner, is a principal contractor, and all others sub-contractors. This means, so far as any question is presented, that those furnishing materials, or performing labor for an owner, or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Butler v. RockwellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
- Stone Post Co. v. CorcoranSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
3Cited by8 opinions
- Federal Lumber Co. v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Caird Engineering Works v. Seven-Up Gold Mining Co., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
- Corporation v. GouldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- C & W ELECTRIC INC. v. Casa Dorado CorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Buerger Investment Co. v. B. F. Salzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.