United States v. Thomas
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
JAMES, Judge:
This case helps illustrate our views on conferences under R.C.M. 802. Appellant assigns only one error, that a conference in the middle of the inquiry into the providence of his pleas of guilty went unrecorded. Relying on United States v. Garcia, 24 M.J. 518 (A.F.C.M.R.1987), he argues that the affected findings must be set aside. We disagree, and we affirm.
Senior Airman Thomas pleaded guilty to and was convicted of 15 bad check specifications and a failure to pay a debt.1 The bad check offenses were charged under Article 134, 10 U.S.C. § 934 as dishonorable…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. SadlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. GarciaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. WirthU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. WhitesideU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
- United States v. CamposU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. MarshU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. CordellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. McQuinnNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.