Legal Opinion

Bead v. Holder, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 7, 2013No. 12-1434PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

In 2007, an Immigration Judge (IJ) ruled that petitioner Ebenezer Jackson Bead had abandoned his asylum application by failing to provide biometric information to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Three years later, Bead moved to reopen his case, arguing that he had received ineffective assistance of counsel. We agree with the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that Bead’s motion to reopen was untimely, and we therefore deny the petition for review.

I. Facts & Background

Bead, a native and citizen of Liberia, entered the United States without inspection on an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kucana v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Dada v. MukaseySupreme Court of the United States · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Agyei v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Sykes v. RBS Citizens, N.A.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014
  3. Perez Santana v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  4. Xin Qiang Liu v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. Bolieiro v. Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API