Legal Opinion

Armstead v. Neptune

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1896No. 8381PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Finney District Court. The opinion herein, filed May 9, 1896, states the nature of the action and the material facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Martin, O. J.: Neptune, on September 27, 1890, commenced his action against Franklin Cartwright and wife to forclose a bond for a deed on a quarter-*751section of land. He made. Armstead and Frush. parties defendant, as claiming some interest. The Cartwrights were in default. Frush filed an answer and cross-petition, alleging in substance that on September 23, 1887, the Cartwrights being the owners of said land, free and clear of all incumbrances except an equitable lien in his favor, he commenced an action in said district court against the Cartwrights…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crippen v. ChappelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zinkeison v. LewisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  2. Penn Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Adams v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Hailey v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Breyfogle v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API